The God Delusion
Moderators: ᴶᵛᵀᴬ, Omphalos, Freakzilla
- chanilover
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: 18 Feb 2008 08:29
The God Delusion
Has anyone else read this book? I'm about halfway through, and I must say this Dawkins bloke is a fantastic bore, although I quite like some of the science parts.
"You and your buddies and that b*tch Mandy are nothing but a gang of lying, socially maladjusted losers." - St Hypatia of Arrakeen.
- guild navigator
- Posts: 56
- Joined: 19 Feb 2008 19:55
- Location: Rhode Island. Lithuania in the summer.
Re: The God Delusion
I've browsed through it, it's decent. When you come to the "angry letters" part, tell me what you think, IIRC it's around the 200s in the hardcover.
If I ever stopped writing, my head would explode.
- GamePlayer
- 70mm God
- Posts: 2993
- Joined: 09 Feb 2008 11:26
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Re: The God Delusion
I read some of it a few years ago. The guy is one hard core militant atheist/secularist/asshole! It's just preaching to the converted. If atheists had an organized religion, Dawkins would likely be required reading
"They can chew you up, but they gotta spit you out."
- Schu
- Posts: 757
- Joined: 18 Dec 2008 00:51
- Location: Adelaide, Aussie
Re: The God Delusion
He's an excellent scientist. He's not a great philosopher. Try reading "the selfish gene" instead. I don't like the god delusion because it's somewhat rabid and it's clearly preaching to the converted.
- Schu
- Posts: 757
- Joined: 18 Dec 2008 00:51
- Location: Adelaide, Aussie
Re: The God Delusion
God forbid! (Oops, did I say that?)GamePlayer wrote:If atheists had an organized religion, Dawkins would likely be required reading
- Apjak
- Posts: 519
- Joined: 30 Jun 2008 12:06
- Location: Kansas City
Re: The God Delusion
I read it a while ago. I got really bored when he blew his philosophical load at the end of chapter 3, then he just seemed angry with people he thought were too stupid to just agree with him. He's mostly responding to St. Augutine with those arguments, and when he just lets Buddism off the hook because "it's not a religion" I think he WAY overgeneralized easten philosophy.
Also, one personal point of contention: he said C. S. Lewis should have known better, but his examples of Lewis' thought weren't Lewis' they were G. K. Chesterton's.
Not Dawkin's best effort, more propaganda than science or philosophy.
Also, one personal point of contention: he said C. S. Lewis should have known better, but his examples of Lewis' thought weren't Lewis' they were G. K. Chesterton's.
Not Dawkin's best effort, more propaganda than science or philosophy.
Last edited by Apjak on 29 Jun 2009 07:54, edited 1 time in total.
I don't think the author should make the reader do that much work - Kevin J. Anderson
We think we've updated 'Dune' for a modern readership without dumbing it down.- Brian Herbert
There’s an unwritten compact between you and the reader. If someone enters a bookstore and sets down hard earned money(energy) for your book, you owe that person some entertainment and as much more as you can give. - Frank Herbert
We think we've updated 'Dune' for a modern readership without dumbing it down.- Brian Herbert
There’s an unwritten compact between you and the reader. If someone enters a bookstore and sets down hard earned money(energy) for your book, you owe that person some entertainment and as much more as you can give. - Frank Herbert
- Nekhrun
- Icelandic Wiener
- Posts: 3298
- Joined: 10 Feb 2008 16:27
Re: The God Delusion
I actually quite liked it. Having been raised as a born again christian it was really quite a relief to see a book like this. I escaped the church influence less than 10 years ago so reading Dawkins has actually been refreshing for me.
What I liked about the book most were some of the quotes from others and his analogies. They really do help to keep things in perspective for people who lived and breathed religion like I did.
What I liked about the book most were some of the quotes from others and his analogies. They really do help to keep things in perspective for people who lived and breathed religion like I did.
"If he was here to discuss Dune, he sure as hell picked a dumb way to do it." -Omphalos
Happy Memorial Day everyone! -James C. Harwood
"Three of my videos have over 100 views."
"Over 500 views for my 'Open Question' video." -Nebiros
Happy Memorial Day everyone! -James C. Harwood
"Three of my videos have over 100 views."
"Over 500 views for my 'Open Question' video." -Nebiros
- inhuien
- Posts: 3643
- Joined: 09 Feb 2008 05:03
Re: The God Delusion
Not trying to be a prick here but how can you be raised as a Born Again Christian. I always thought it is a "Returning to the fold" term applicable to one that has wandered from the path of righteousness.Nekhrun wrote:I actually quite liked it. Having been raised as a born again christian it was really quite a relief to see a book like this. ...
- Nekhrun
- Icelandic Wiener
- Posts: 3298
- Joined: 10 Feb 2008 16:27
Re: The God Delusion
If that applies to my mother then I am raised in that environment.inhuien wrote:Not trying to be a prick here but how can you be raised as a Born Again Christian. I always thought it is a "Returning to the fold" term applicable to one that has wandered from the path of righteousness.Nekhrun wrote:I actually quite liked it. Having been raised as a born again christian it was really quite a relief to see a book like this. ...
"If he was here to discuss Dune, he sure as hell picked a dumb way to do it." -Omphalos
Happy Memorial Day everyone! -James C. Harwood
"Three of my videos have over 100 views."
"Over 500 views for my 'Open Question' video." -Nebiros
Happy Memorial Day everyone! -James C. Harwood
"Three of my videos have over 100 views."
"Over 500 views for my 'Open Question' video." -Nebiros
- A Thing of Eternity
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: 08 Apr 2008 15:35
- Location: Calgary Alberta
Re: The God Delusion
I got tired of Dawkins quickly watching him debate theists on you-tube. He is a brilliant evolutionary biologist, but he knows almost ZERO about the three big Abrahamic religions. I know almost nothing and I know that a lot of what he spouts in his debates (and his book) is nonsense. If you want to debate religious people, fine - but you've got to do better than to just repeat over and over that the bible promotes genocide (which it does but that's not the point).
If you want to read/listen to atheists who actually make an impact I'd highly recommend Dan Dennet and Sam Harris. Both do a much better job than Dawkins.
If you want to read/listen to atheists who actually make an impact I'd highly recommend Dan Dennet and Sam Harris. Both do a much better job than Dawkins.
- DuneFishUK
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 25 May 2008 14:14
- Location: Cool Britannia
- Contact:
Re: The God Delusion
I thought that point was to illustrate the wider point that law and morality are not based in religion?A Thing of Eternity wrote:the bible promotes genocide (which it does but that's not the point).
I quite liked the book (audiobook actually - mostly read by him) - I didn't really like the man as much, but he does have an answer all the points I've ever heard raised by theists.
Will have check out those others though.
- http://www.kullwahad.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; - http://dunefont.kullwahad.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; -
- Mandy
- Cat Herder
- Posts: 1704
- Joined: 08 Feb 2008 20:18
- Contact:
Re: The God Delusion
inhuien wrote:Not trying to be a prick here but how can you be raised as a Born Again Christian. I always thought it is a "Returning to the fold" term applicable to one that has wandered from the path of righteousness.Nekhrun wrote:I actually quite liked it. Having been raised as a born again christian it was really quite a relief to see a book like this. ...
"Born again Christian" means that the person has been "saved". You are reborn as a Christian after accepting Jesus as your savior.. something like that. It's something evangelicals say.
As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Hypatia approaches one.
- Freakzilla
- Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
- Posts: 18454
- Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Contact:
Re: The God Delusion
I was born correctly the first time... except that I was a c-section baby. My mom says that's why I used to sneak out the doggy door at night when I was a teenager.
Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
~Pink Snowman
- Tleszer
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: 17 Feb 2008 18:02
Re: The God Delusion
Sure you weren't trying to sneak in?
Erm, not your mother's, of course!
Erm, not your mother's, of course!
DUNE, as interpreted by a blue man with a green tushie
- A Thing of Eternity
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: 08 Apr 2008 15:35
- Location: Calgary Alberta
Re: The God Delusion
Yes, but Dawkins tends to over-simplify the passages he's criticising, I'd have to watch his videos again, but he says lots of things about Christianity that are flat out miss-interpreted.DuneFishUK wrote:I thought that point was to illustrate the wider point that law and morality are not based in religion?A Thing of Eternity wrote:the bible promotes genocide (which it does but that's not the point).
I quite liked the book (audiobook actually - mostly read by him) - I didn't really like the man as much, but he does have an answer all the points I've ever heard raised by theists.
Will have check out those others though.
I just prefer the aproach of Harris and Dennet, they really exemplify what a positive atheist is. They argue without being disrepectful, while maintaining the firm position that there is no god, and anyone who believes so is wrong. They also focus more on the positive side of atheism rather than just relying on pointing out the negative side of religion (though they don't shy from this when it comes up). I think they are much more effective.
- SadisticCynic
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: 07 Apr 2009 09:28
- Location: In Time or in Space?
Re: The God Delusion
This at least I can respect. Being called deluded isn't exactly a winning argument...They argue without being disrepectful, while maintaining the firm position that there is no god, and anyone who believes so is wrong.
Ah English, the language where pretty much any word can have any meaning! - A Thing of Eternity
- A Thing of Eternity
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: 08 Apr 2008 15:35
- Location: Calgary Alberta
Re: The God Delusion
True, but it is what it is. I don’t think people on either side of the argument should censor themselves to the point of watering down their beliefs.SadisticCynic wrote:This at least I can respect. Being called deluded isn't exactly a winning argument...They argue without being disrepectful, while maintaining the firm position that there is no god, and anyone who believes so is wrong.
One of my #1 complaints about inter-faith and faith-atheist debates is when people take the whole "respecting other people's beliefs" too far. The fact of the matter is that most people, (aside from some agnostics, religious pluralists, and people from religions that don't exclude other religions from being true) simply do not in truth respect each other’s beliefs, and while I believe we should all strive to respect each other, we should also be honest when we truly don’t.
What do we mean by respect anyways? I think most people actually mean being respect”ful” rather than actually having respect. I doubt very much that many religious people respect atheists, most will eventually admit that they think atheism is an arrogant delusion, and this is true of most atheists’ opinions towards religious people. I can be respectful, but this is very different from respecting IMO. I do think that believing in a god is delusional, and I’m sure most religious people think that I am delusional. I'm not going to insult someone's intelligence by lying to them and saying that I think it's fine to believe in a god. That said - I don’t think that atheists should be purposefully antagonizing religious people, that just makes things worse, and accomplishes nothing. I think real conversation can only take place when both sides of this issue are respectful, while admitting the truth that they do actually lack some respect for the other side.
I think it’s more respectful for me to treat religious people like adults who can handle the truth, rather than sugar coating things. That would be a real insult, IMO. Also, just because I don't have much respect for a person's religious beliefs doesn't mean that I don't still respect them as a human being.
Hope that made sense.
- SandChigger
- KJASF Ground Zero
- Posts: 14492
- Joined: 08 Feb 2008 22:29
- Location: A continuing state of irritation
- Contact:
Re: The God Delusion
You, too? Kewl! Let's start a new clique! Who else is in?Freakzilla wrote:I was a c-section baby.
BONUS points for raising the incest issue!Tleszer wrote:Sure you weren't trying to sneak in?
Erm, not your mother's, of course!
Now who did Cain marry again?
"Let the dead give water to the dead. As for me, it's NO MORE FUCKING TEARS!"
- SadisticCynic
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: 07 Apr 2009 09:28
- Location: In Time or in Space?
Re: The God Delusion
Makes a lot of sense, I like it.
Ah English, the language where pretty much any word can have any meaning! - A Thing of Eternity
- Tleszer
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: 17 Feb 2008 18:02
Re: The God Delusion
Sweet. Thanks, Chig!SandChigger wrote:BONUS points for raising the incest issue!Tleszer wrote:Sure you weren't trying to sneak in?
Erm, not your mother's, of course!
Now who did Cain marry again?
Even though the points don't matter, I think I'll use them to buy a vowel. I think... the letter "O" will do just nicely.
DUNE, as interpreted by a blue man with a green tushie
- Redstar
- Posts: 1202
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009 04:13
Re: The God Delusion
I believe I've read this book. Can't say I recognize the cover, but what's entailed inside sounds familiar.
I enjoyed it, but found a lot of the reasoning to be circular and using Hitchhiker's logic to disprove Judeo-Christian-Islamic god, though I was interested in the historical approach to the Bible. Which really isn't a big deal, coming from a writer that likes to treat most literature on somewhat of a metaphorical level.
Interesting fact: I read the book at my aunt's, whom is a diehard fire-and-brimstone Christian that comes from a church denouncing alcohol in all forms, proclaiming that Jesus and other Biblical figures drank "grape juice", and has a pastor that blatantly quotes from his own head and refuses to be shown correct verses in his head. My aunt keeps such books as jokes for her Christian buddies, and even gave me a book on evolution for "a laugh". (I played along)
I enjoyed it, but found a lot of the reasoning to be circular and using Hitchhiker's logic to disprove Judeo-Christian-Islamic god, though I was interested in the historical approach to the Bible. Which really isn't a big deal, coming from a writer that likes to treat most literature on somewhat of a metaphorical level.
Interesting fact: I read the book at my aunt's, whom is a diehard fire-and-brimstone Christian that comes from a church denouncing alcohol in all forms, proclaiming that Jesus and other Biblical figures drank "grape juice", and has a pastor that blatantly quotes from his own head and refuses to be shown correct verses in his head. My aunt keeps such books as jokes for her Christian buddies, and even gave me a book on evolution for "a laugh". (I played along)
- Eyes High
- Patience Personified
- Posts: 2322
- Joined: 22 Jul 2008 15:32
- Location: between the worlds of men and make believe
Re: The God Delusion
I like the way you said that Thing. And it made good sense to me.A Thing of Eternity wrote:True, but it is what it is. I don’t think people on either side of the argument should censor themselves to the point of watering down their beliefs.SadisticCynic wrote:This at least I can respect. Being called deluded isn't exactly a winning argument...They argue without being disrepectful, while maintaining the firm position that there is no god, and anyone who believes so is wrong.
One of my #1 complaints about inter-faith and faith-atheist debates is when people take the whole "respecting other people's beliefs" too far. The fact of the matter is that most people, (aside from some agnostics, religious pluralists, and people from religions that don't exclude other religions from being true) simply do not in truth respect each other’s beliefs, and while I believe we should all strive to respect each other, we should also be honest when we truly don’t.
What do we mean by respect anyways? I think most people actually mean being respect”ful” rather than actually having respect. I doubt very much that many religious people respect atheists, most will eventually admit that they think atheism is an arrogant delusion, and this is true of most atheists’ opinions towards religious people. I can be respectful, but this is very different from respecting IMO. I do think that believing in a god is delusional, and I’m sure most religious people think that I am delusional. I'm not going to insult someone's intelligence by lying to them and saying that I think it's fine to believe in a god. That said - I don’t think that atheists should be purposefully antagonizing religious people, that just makes things worse, and accomplishes nothing. I think real conversation can only take place when both sides of this issue are respectful, while admitting the truth that they do actually lack some respect for the other side.
I think it’s more respectful for me to treat religious people like adults who can handle the truth, rather than sugar coating things. That would be a real insult, IMO. Also, just because I don't have much respect for a person's religious beliefs doesn't mean that I don't still respect them as a human being.
Hope that made sense.
Of course there are somethings in which we disagree on; however, it seems like we do agree on the still respect the person as a human being w/o having to 'respect' their belief.
I've grown to learn that if you are true to your belief and true to yourself, then people are more likely to respect you even if they disagree with you. Will everyone do that? Of course not. But we should each try our best to set the example of respecting our fellow human being. IMHO
And thank you all who have shown me such much respect and acceptance here at Jac.
And yeah....each of you are in my prayers. I know many do not share my belief but I hope you will understand why I pray for my online friends.
Take care and have a nice day.
What fear is there in the night?
Nothing, but that which is in our own imaginations.
Nothing, but that which is in our own imaginations.
- Schu
- Posts: 757
- Joined: 18 Dec 2008 00:51
- Location: Adelaide, Aussie
Re: The God Delusion
I think the only time I've ever disapproved of someone praying for me was when they told me they prayed that I'd "see the light" and convert to christianity. Every time other than that, I've just thought it was something nice, along the lines of "you're in my thoughts". So I hope other people don't have any problem with you praying for the,Eyes High wrote:And yeah....each of you are in my prayers. I know many do not share my belief but I hope you will understand why I pray for my online friends.
- Freakzilla
- Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
- Posts: 18454
- Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Contact:
Re: The God Delusion
IMO it's pointless to argue with people who quote The Bible (or whatever "holy book") as a factual reference. It's a lost cause at that point.
Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
~Pink Snowman
- DuneFishUK
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 25 May 2008 14:14
- Location: Cool Britannia
- Contact:
Re: The God Delusion
I downloaded a really (really) nice audio version of the bible to listen to at work.
I do still want to finish it... but I couldn't get past Numbers - it's fucking wierd and really quite boring
I do still want to finish it... but I couldn't get past Numbers - it's fucking wierd and really quite boring
- http://www.kullwahad.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; - http://dunefont.kullwahad.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; -