![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon/smile.gif)
(yeah, I know, but it's still punny)
Moderators: ᴶᵛᵀᴬ, Omphalos, Freakzilla
lundse2 wrote:
BTW, When in the chronology does this quote originate?
Quote:
A second son would come, however. There would be another Leto, but that, too, carried heavy consequences—especially for Chani.
After weeks of arguing on this thread, Arnie wrote:I haven't read PoD so I can't answer that question.
SandRider wrote:lundse2 wrote:
BTW, When in the chronology does this quote originate?
Quote:
A second son would come, however. There would be another Leto, but that, too, carried heavy consequences—especially for Chani.After weeks of arguing on this thread, Arnie wrote:I haven't read PoD so I can't answer that question.
This is news?Freakzilla wrote:SandRider wrote:lundse2 wrote:
BTW, When in the chronology does this quote originate?
Quote:
A second son would come, however. There would be another Leto, but that, too, carried heavy consequences—especially for Chani.After weeks of arguing on this thread, Arnie wrote:I haven't read PoD so I can't answer that question.Unfuckinbelievable.
Cockbreath? Everyone else's cock doesn't smell as bad as yours.SandRider wrote:I'd also like to apologize to any homosexuals we may have on
this board for my use of the word "cockbreath". It is an unfortunate
word often used by cranky old men, and in no way indicates my
condemnation of you, your chosen and/or born-that-way lifestyle
and sexual orientation, or hobbies.
May the God of Your Choice Bless and Keep You.
Good. If I have one purpose in life now it is to keep Byron and hisSandChigger wrote:No, not really, but this is rich:
It appears either Byron or arnie himself has now deleted the comment.
Fucking hilarious!
SandRider wrote:Good. If I have one purpose in life now it is to keep Byron and hisSandChigger wrote:No, not really, but this is rich:
It appears either Byron or arnie himself has now deleted the comment.
Fucking hilarious!
minions jumping over here to see what I've posted about their foolishness
Over There and editing it, then jumping back over here to see if it their
Cover Ups were caught and exposed. I call this Control.
And, as with my apology to Miss Mandy, I was serious and sincere. I do
use the terms cocksucker, cockbreath, dicksucker, cumdrunk ass-monkey,
ass-fuckers, bitchass punks, jizz hounds, and the like too liberally and in a
derogatory manner, and I simply wanted to explain that while I have no
intention of ceasing my use of these phrases, I nevertheless do not intend
disrespect to homosexuals, bisexuals, or the unsure.
I wouldn't suck it with Arnoldo's mouth.You can take this however you wish.
And yes, my penis does stink.
So what's your point ?
Now that's just a hurtful thing to say.CL wrote:I wouldn't suck it with Arnoldo's mouth.
Simon wrote: What's the "starred" deal?
Merrit wrote:They give it to books they feel are superior in the genre.
easy, slingblade. I know a guy who knows a guy who hadDuke wrote:provide me with one legitimate review for Paul of Dune
Merrit wrote:Worse according to you and the other OHers(sic). But not so for those who enjoy PAUL OF DUNE, including Library Journal, Booklist, and Publisher's Weekly, some of the top rated review sources in the nation.
Nekhrun wrote:Got it. Those who enjoy that book think those were actual reviews and most don't. I'm still suprised that someone like yourself who writes reviews doesn't see the difference between one of your reviews and one of those.
and then, today:Merrit wrote:Certainly there's a difference. But you've gotta remember that these big review houses receive literally thousands of books per month and then they have to decide which ones to review, then which ones to give long versus short reviews. The old "so many books, so little time" theory applies to them, I'm sure.
Simon wrote:I just don't understand why people feel the need to "demand confession!".
What is, is. It's plain to see. What "possible difference" could a public statement make? The books would still be. And, semantics aside, nothing would change. Would BH and KJA's admission of (fill in the blank with your personal gripe) make everything better? No. Denials and confirmations are all silliness and truly irrelevant. The books speak for themselves. If they don't speak to you, or worse grate on your sense, then no defense will ever suffice. So why keep asking for the impossible? These "answers".