Re: "New Canon" Inconsistency Concordance
Posted: 10 May 2010 13:14
I love how he thinks McDune is as [memerizing] as Harry Potter.
DUNE DISCUSSION FORUM FOR ORTHODOX HERBERTARIANS
http://www.jacurutu.com/
Now also on Twitter! (He's following me! He's following me! It must be CYBERSTALKING!!! Quick, call the FBI!!!)Common Sense Central
For those who seek plain talk and absolute brutal truth.
A no nonsense web site by Bob Williams
The good old days ...TheDukester wrote:Wow, that was surprisingly easy ... maybe I need to get out more.
Ladies and gents, I give you "Kudos to Brian and Keith."
http://goo.gl/8IAC" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Maybe Keith can help?SandChigger wrote:Remember, there's NO LONGER ANY NEED to get yer "Bonzo for Barsoom" Bob SECONDHAND!!!
Go STRAIGHT (like Science Fiction Author Hardwoody!) to the source!
http://www.commonsensecentral.net/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Now also on Twitter! (He's following me! He's following me! It must be CYBERSTALKING!!! Quick, call the FBI!!!)Common Sense Central
For those who seek plain talk and absolute brutal truth.
A no nonsense web site by Bob Williams
Now also on Twitter! (He's following me! He's following me! It must be CYBERSTALKING!!! Quick, call the FBI!!!)SandChigger wrote: A no nonsense web site by Bob Williams
exactly right, that's where I picked it up from .... I try not to type "Kevin J. Anderson" unlessTheDukester wrote:Wow, that was surprisingly easy ... maybe I need to get out more.
Ladies and gents, I give you "Kudos to Brian and Keith."
http://goo.gl/8IAC" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I can't say I've read McDune books extensively, but I must confess I didn't notice any character development at all. On the contrary, the good guys seem to be always good, and the villains keep doing evil things and being total buffoons all the time (that, at least, is the impression that the House books left on me).TheDukester wrote:Further, it's the difference between lazy story-telling and effective story-telling. Relying on an A-->>B answer oversimplifies everything is an "easy out" for an author with few skills (and, further, an audience who can't think for themselves). Having the baron slowly backslide over time is much more effective (more tragic, even), and presents a fuller picture of the character for the reader.
Correct. What I'm referring to is that GHM speculated that those with many faces controlled their futar creations with sex. If the many faces were robots...would they control their futars with sex? If so why wouldn't Keith dictate it into their abominations?Freakzilla wrote:It was seriously implied that GHM was sleeping with her futar. I don't think there's much "probably" about it.
"I'll bet your lovers often kiss your chin," Lucilla said.Freakzilla wrote:It was seriously implied that GHM was sleeping with her futar. I don't think there's much "probably" about it.
Hmmm... I dont' remember that but it's a great inconsistancy if true. Can you provide a quote?A Little Galach wrote:Correct. What I'm referring to is that GHM speculated that those with many faces controlled their futar creations with sex. If the many faces were robots...would they control their futars with sex? If so why wouldn't Keith dictate it into their abominations?Freakzilla wrote:It was seriously implied that GHM was sleeping with her futar. I don't think there's much "probably" about it.
is there a copy of Chapterhouse posted somewhere?Freakzilla wrote:Hmmm... I dont' remember that but it's a great inconsistancy if true. Can you provide a quote?A Little Galach wrote:Correct. What I'm referring to is that GHM speculated that those with many faces controlled their futar creations with sex. If the many faces were robots...would they control their futars with sex? If so why wouldn't Keith dictate it into their abominations?Freakzilla wrote:It was seriously implied that GHM was sleeping with her futar. I don't think there's much "probably" about it.
I emailed you a PDF composite of the US and UK editions.A Little Galach wrote:is there a copy of Chapterhouse posted somewhere?Freakzilla wrote:Hmmm... I dont' remember that but it's a great inconsistancy if true. Can you provide a quote?A Little Galach wrote:Correct. What I'm referring to is that GHM speculated that those with many faces controlled their futar creations with sex. If the many faces were robots...would they control their futars with sex? If so why wouldn't Keith dictate it into their abominations?Freakzilla wrote:It was seriously implied that GHM was sleeping with her futar. I don't think there's much "probably" about it.
Some Honored Matres snickered and said Great Honored Matre dared bed a Futar. Logno thought it possible. This GHM dared many things. Had she not salvaged some of The Weapons from the disaster of the scattering? Futars, though? The sisters knew Futars could not be bonded by sex. At least not by sex with humans. That might be the way the Enemies of Many Faces did it, though. Who knew?
Towards the end of the House books I started to picture Rabban and the Baron as scooby doo villains. Foiled again! Those damn kids!MrFlibble wrote:TheDukester wrote: On the contrary, the good guys seem to be always good, and the villains keep doing evil things and being total buffoons all the time (that, at least, is the impression that the House books left on me).
Is this directed to me and if so, didn't I just do that?Freakzilla wrote:You should post this in the Inconsistancy Concordance topic.
Um, I don't remember that. Lucilla managed to find out that Futars needed a command from handlers, of whom is nothing known, to attack. Without Handlers, Futars were (relatively) harmless to HMs. No mention of Futar control via sex (although it remains unclear how Futars identified Handlers; perhaps they were conditioned to obey to some form of command language).A Little Galach wrote:What I'm referring to is that GHM speculated that those with many faces controlled their futar creations with sex. If the many faces were robots...would they control their futars with sex? If so why wouldn't Keith dictate it into their abominations?
Where am I?SandRider wrote:shhh .... Freak be smokin the chronic again ....
just nod, agree, and back slowly away ...
I am Batman!Freakzilla wrote:Where am I?SandRider wrote:shhh .... Freak be smokin the chronic again ....
just nod, agree, and back slowly away ...
You are correct. However I am referring to the speculation I quoted above by the GHM about the Futars and masters. Idle speculation, admittedly, but it certainly indicates that it was a possibility.MrFlibble wrote:Um, I don't remember that. Lucilla managed to find out that Futars needed a command from handlers, of whom is nothing known, to attack. Without Handlers, Futars were (relatively) harmless to HMs. No mention of Futar control via sex (although it remains unclear how Futars identified Handlers; perhaps they were conditioned to obey to some form of command language).A Little Galach wrote:What I'm referring to is that GHM speculated that those with many faces controlled their futar creations with sex. If the many faces were robots...would they control their futars with sex? If so why wouldn't Keith dictate it into their abominations?