Page 2 of 4

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 16 Dec 2009 10:37
by Freakzilla
Idahopotato wrote:
Freakzilla wrote:If it was privately (I beleive it is) owned land, and someone was hunting there without permission...
I don't think dressing up like big foot just to hunt private land is the wisest of ideas. At least someone might hesitate shooting a human that was poaching their land. But a big foot? I am pretty sure all they would see is dollar signs and an Oprah interview as they squeezed the trigger.
No, I was saying it could be a poacher in a dark coat trying to avoid the camera, not dressed as bigfoot.

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 16 Dec 2009 11:35
by lotek
I say shoot it anyway, if it's a poacher you're sending a strong message to the others and if it's bigfoot well Kaching' here come that dollar rain!!

win win situation :)

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 16 Dec 2009 11:39
by TheDukester
And if it's a Furry who got lost ...

... well, then you've killed a Furry. Which means you automatically go to heaven.

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 16 Dec 2009 12:21
by Eyes High
You guys are something else.....

I say use a tranquilezer gun, a live bigfoot would garner you more money and if it any of the other...well who knows what could happen after they wake up. :angelic-red: :violence-stickwhack: :violence-smack: :violence-axechase: :orcs-whip:

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 16 Dec 2009 12:54
by Omphalos
I wonder how it tastes?

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 16 Dec 2009 14:10
by TheDukester
Heh. Bigfoot tastes like ... chicken! Heh. Heh-heh.

Image

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 16 Dec 2009 19:46
by Dune Nerd
Benjamin Radford writes a column for livescience and is part of the skeptic community, he writes a nice little article talking about the newest 'evidence' for bigfoot.

http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/ ... razor.html

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 08 Jan 2010 00:35
by SandRider
Bigfeet taste like chupracabras


I've had a family of them little bastards living under one of the barns
for years now. Fucking Mexicans are scared shitless of 'em, won't go
near that barn. I've had many opportunities to hit them over their
little pointed scaly heads with a cotton hoe, but they kill rattlesnakes,
so I leave 'em be.

they may or not be endangered, I don't know. This cute little girl
from A&M came out one summer to study them, but they latched
onto her legs and drug her up under the barn, and I never saw her
again. That was kind of a shame, she was a real little cutie, I'd
hoped to get her drunk out by the campfire and get me some good,
old-fashioned molestin.

Bigfeets, on the other hand, have no social or environmental value
that I know of, and will in fact masturbate on you every chance they
get. I recommend not gettin more'n 20 or 30 feet near 'em, & wear a
jacket.

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 08 Jan 2010 03:25
by SandChigger
:lol:

Keep that up and the Natural History Museum will be contacting you to write a series of textbooks for the youngins.

I mean, If NASA will hire Keith & Jabecca.... :doh:

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 17 Jun 2010 20:10
by Freakzilla
Bigfoot is back in the news...

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/bigfoo ... d=10941346" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Bigfoot discovered? Virginia Man Says He's on Verge of Bigfoot Discovery
Bigfoot Is Alive and Well, Says Bigfoot Expert

27 comments By PAUL SCHWARTZMAN
June 17, 2010

Billy Willard says he's on the verge of a major discovery that could change the way humans think about the natural world, not to mention their need for a creature-proof home security system.

Here in Spotsylvania County, in the forests around Lake Anna, Willard claims there have been 14 sightings in the past decade of that most fabled of cryptozoic beasts: Bigfoot.

Or Sasquatch , as the elusive, apelike brute is referred to in more high-minded circles -- and on the side of Willard's blue pickup. The decal on the truck reads "Sasquatch Watch of Virginia," of which Willard is chief pooh-bah (when he's not earning a living installing and removing underground home oil tanks).

Go ahead, call him a loon, a flake, a huckster. He's heard it all. But Willard knows what he knows, which is that three people from this area -- a woman, her husband and their granddaughter -- told him they saw a shaggy, super-size figure on two legs gallivanting across their wooded property.

Last month, Willard led a weeklong expedition to the site, where he installed five motion-sensor cameras that will snap photos if the big galoot wanders by again.

Bigfoot Expert: We Are Close to a Major Discovery
Willard, 41, says he'd like to lead a tour of the property and introduce the witnesses, really he would. But the woman who says she saw what she believes could have been Bigfoot fears an avalanche of ridicule, which is why Willard is left to begin delivering his version of what happened a few miles away, in the parking lot of a Dairy Queen.

"We believe we may be close to some kind of major discovery," he says. "All the things they would need are here, fresh water, shelter in the woods. The high concentration of sightings tells me they're here."

He interrupts his monologue to answer his cellphone, the ring tone to which is the country tune "People Are Crazy."

Ever since humans began telling stories, they have spun yarns involving life forms that tower above mere mortals, whether it's the giant of "Jack and the Beanstalk" fame or Goliath or Frankenstein. Bigfoot has been a perennial for generations, with hundreds of purported sightings (many of them of supposed footprints), most prevalent in the Pacific Northwest but also popping up in states as disparate as Rhode Island, Illinois and Alabama.

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 17 Jun 2010 20:30
by SandChigger
Freakzilla quoting a news report wrote:they saw a ... super-size figure on two legs gallivanting across their wooded property.
Has TheKJA been dictahiking in Virginia recently? :P
shaggy
Oh, sorry, missed that the first time! :oops:

CAN'T be him. Unless he was hiking butt-nekkid again and they were referring to unsightly shoulder and bum hair? :lol:

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 18 Jun 2010 01:57
by cmsahe
What if Bigfoot is a non-physical entity, belonging to a whole set of entities who inhabit and share the Earth with us? These ideas are shared by Jacques Vallée

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_autor_vallee.htm

Passport to Magonia:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/8652147/Passp ... lel-Worlds

After years of studying the UFO phenomena he observed that all the sightings were illogical, crazy, sometimes plainly stupid (like ufo astronauts asking for fertilizer and giving in return oat cookies), witnesses describing the interior of the UFO as comprising of a kitchenette only, and sometimes the reports that are terrorific, and many of them share many things in common with the follkore of elves and demons, and the apparitions of the virgin mary too. So he concluded that the UFOs are not the spacecrafts of alien astronauts but beings coming from this same planet, living in another plane of existence (or the manifestation of a communal human mind).

He is the french ufologist represented by Spielberg in Close Encounters of the Third Kind by the character of Lancombe played by François Truffaut and, his teacher J. Allen Hynek has a cameo in the movie.

It is reported that Vallée asked Speilberg to embrace his non-alien theory but that Spielberg answered him that the people would be confused and that they expected to be entertained with a movie about extraterrestrials.

And I have seen manifestations of entities along my life.

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 18 Jun 2010 02:35
by SandChigger
ENTIA NON SUNT MULTIPLICANDA PRAETER NECESSITATEM

Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity. Occam's razor.

A commonality of inexplicable experiences across times and places should first be assumed to tell us something about the experiencers—human beings—as they are the known entities, before rushing off to imagine and/or accept theories of otherwise unattested entities.

It's fun to believe in Bigfoot and other queer beasties. I LOVE watching "Monster Quest" and those crazy "UFO Hunters". But I'm not about to even consider the possibility of the existence of any of that without SOME REAL EVIDENCE. ;)

(I've been seeing manifestations of entities myself for nearly half a century now. I call them physical beings. :lol: )

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 18 Jun 2010 05:34
by merkin muffley
cmsahe wrote:all the sightings were illogical, crazy, sometimes plainly stupid (like ufo astronauts asking for fertilizer and giving in return oat cookies), witnesses describing the interior of the UFO as comprising of a kitchenette only
Holy shit, somebody needs to make that movie. "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Collective Unconscious" directed by Michel Gondry, written by Charlie Kaufman, starring Onasander as Dr. Jung. Co-produced by Kevin J. Anderson and Brian Herbert. With Rebecca Moesta as Bigfoot.

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 18 Jun 2010 11:31
by A Thing of Eternity
That's great, this is the exact opposit of occam's razor - let's take something and apply the most complicated possible explanation. :lol:

The most likely thing (not 100% of course, nothing is - but close enough) that explains any UFO sighting, ghost sighting, monster sighting, etc, is as Chig said - the person seeing it having a nice ol' glitch in the brain.

I've seen some weird stuff too, just like everyone else. But let's say someone sees a ghost. People are weakminded, and scared of the idea that their brain might not be functioning normally, so most people will jump to the conclusion that they did actually see a ghost, rather than the conclusion that their brain hiccup'd.

One of those things is more likely than the other (giant orders of magnitude more likely) - and the fact that in situations like this most people jump for the less likely conclusion without any thought should set off alarm bells warning people that they're not properly thinking things in life through.

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 18 Jun 2010 13:27
by SandChigger
I don't know that it's really a question of being weak-minded or scared, at least initially, when the false perception occurs. (The weak-mindedness and fear come into play later, when people BELIEVE and no amount of counter-evidence can convince them they were mistaken.) We're accustomed by normal, everyday experience to trust our senses, so when they tell us something is there, we believe them. But we've all had experiences of thinking we see one thing only to realize an instant later that it's actually something else.

And of course sometimes the problem isn't in our sense organs or brains at all, but in the information the environment is presenting us with.

But yeah, a LOT of people are just too gullible. I blame the religious instruction of children. If you're trained at an early age to believe one set of silly ideas, you're pre-conditioned to accept more of them later in life. ;)

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 18 Jun 2010 16:31
by A Thing of Eternity
SandChigger wrote:I don't know that it's really a question of being weak-minded or scared, at least initially, when the false perception occurs. (The weak-mindedness and fear come into play later, when people BELIEVE and no amount of counter-evidence can convince them they were mistaken.)
Yes, this is exactly what I meant, not that those are involved with the original false perception (nice wording by the way) occurs.

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 20 Jun 2010 00:26
by cmsahe
There is this interesting documentary, hosted by Rod Serling, Jacques Vallée and J. Allen Hynek appear from time to time, for me it's tender listening to J. Allen Hynek at one point almost mumbling what I mentioned before .

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 843029418#

The part where they cover cattle mutilations covers physical evidence.

....
Entity noun pl entities

2. being or existence, especially when considered as distinct, independent or self-contained: He conceived of society as composed of particular entities requiring special treatment

dictionary.com

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 16:07
by Kensai
Bigfoot's girl friend LOL

Image

Seriously Freak where do they find these people?

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 19:31
by SandChigger
I like how that question was directed at Freak. :lol:

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 21:50
by Omphalos
That's hot.

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 09 Jul 2010 11:30
by Kensai
SandChigger wrote:I like how that question was directed at Freak. :lol:
Somewhere on this forum wrote:No porn unless its stuff Freak likes.

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 09 Jul 2010 16:24
by merkin muffley
What kind of awful, degenerate website has pictures like that? And where do I find it?

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 09 Jul 2010 19:51
by Freakzilla
There was recently a giant chick on Tosh.0 whom men pay for her to sit on them, pick them up, throw them around and stuff like that.

I don't know where they come from.

Re: New Bigfoot Picture

Posted: 09 Jul 2010 19:56
by Nekhrun
Freakzilla wrote:There was recently a giant chick on Tosh.0 whom men pay for her to sit on them, pick them up, throw them around and stuff like that.

I don't know where they come from.
Heaven.